1. JJL
    February 14, 2013 @ 6:09 pm

    Red '65 Mustang Convertible, of course!


  2. CFlo
    February 14, 2013 @ 6:10 pm

    An Audi R8 V10. If I could. Because that's her dream car. I'd say a '66 Volvo 1800S as a runner-up, but she already bought one for herself!


  3. Anonymous
    February 14, 2013 @ 6:20 pm

    1993 Volvo 850 for $500. I spent another $1000 on tires, timing belt, and replacing/refurbishing a bunch of miscellaneous parts. It's brown, it's slow, it's old, it's boxy, and it has a standard transmission. She can drive that for another 10 years. This is what she gets after crashing three expensive high performance cars, and trashing another two in the past 5 years.

    Don't text and drive, don't drink and drive, and stay away from those drive-throughs folks!


  4. Anonymous
    February 14, 2013 @ 7:12 pm

    A twin turbo 911 convertible with upgraded alpha 28 turbos to get her blood pumping, would be nice.


  5. Anonymous
    February 14, 2013 @ 9:15 pm

    The 1965 Aston Martin DB6 Radford Shooting Brake that's on auction at Bonhams, right now. Well, it's out of my price range by a factor of more than ten but, otherwise, I would.


  6. Anonymous
    February 14, 2013 @ 9:36 pm

    I absolutly love these little cars,great handling,lightweight,almost 50/50 weight ditribution.I had probably 10 of them.
    However Id go with the second gen,because it has the bigger 1.8l engine.Also try to get an M edition.abs,leather seats,bbs wheels,limited slip,power mirrors and windows,ac,headrest speakers.Hard top is always a bonus.Jackson racing makes bolt on superchargers,and Moss Motors carries a large portfolio of oem and aftermarket parts for these gems.
    They are getting harder and harder to find in good condition.Mark my words,these are going to be collectible.
    These engines are bullet proof,easy 200-250k miles lifetime.


  7. OneFish TwoFish
    February 14, 2013 @ 10:46 pm

    Gotta be a minivan. Used, 2000-2004 Odessy or Sienna. Someone has to haul the kids around.


  8. Anonymous
    February 15, 2013 @ 8:16 pm

    Only a tramp-stamped, wine-cooler-drinking, Kenny G fan would drive this car. Sorry D.T., this car has no appeal. I maintain that this car has no style and therefore does not qualify for an exemption to the criteria outlined in the Spouse Vehicle Agreement Contract of 2004 which clearly states that the wife's vehicle needs to be capable of (1) Starting Regularly; (2) Transporting small people safely; and (3) Hauling spare parts for the husband's less reliable modes of transportation. Further, Amendment 1 clearly stipulates that the wife should not be required to wear shoes she can push in, in order to operate the vehicle. I strongly suspect that this car might be in violation of all 4 of these regulations.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *